Tuesday, September 19, 2017
My recent interview on Daily Wire’s The Andrew Klavan Show has now been posted. You can hear the audio at the Daily Wire website or at Ricochet, and you can see the video either at the Daily Wire (if you are a subscriber) or on Facebook. (Addendum: You can now watch it on YouTube as well.) We talk about The Last Superstition, mechanism versus teleology, natural law, and Five Proofs of the Existence of God.
Friday, September 15, 2017
Thoughts and experiences seem to lack spatial location. It makes sense to say of a certain cluster of neurons firing that they are located several centimeters in from your left ear. But it seems to make no sense to say that your experience of feeling nervous, or your thought about the Pythagorean Theorem, is located several centimeters in from your left ear. After all, no one who opened up your skull or took an X-ray of your head would see the thought or the experience, nor would either be detectible through any other perceptual means. In his book The Mysterious Flame: Conscious Minds in a Material World, Colin McGinn defends this commonsense supposition that mental states and processes are not locatable in space.
Monday, September 11, 2017
Today on his Daily Wire podcast, Ben Shapiro kindly recommended my book The Last Superstition, characterizing it as “really fantastically written” and “rare for a philosophy book, really readable and lucid.” His comments on the book can be heard about 38 minutes into the show.
Speaking of The Daily Wire, I will be interviewed this week on The Andrew Klavan Show.
Friday, September 8, 2017
The Steely Dan sound is well known to anyone who has heard even one or two of the band’s best known songs, and founders Donald Fagen and Walter Becker contributed equally to it. Fagen’s is the voice we associate with that sound. What we might call the Steely Dan attitude, however, derives in large part from Becker, who died earlier this week.
Saturday, September 2, 2017
Having looked recently at David Hume on induction and Hume on causation, let’s take a look at Hume’s famous treatment of miracles. To be more precise, let’s take a look at Hume’s argument as it is interpreted by Antony Flew in his introduction to the Open Court Classics edition of Hume’s essay Of Miracles. This being Hume, the argument is, shall we say, problematic.